One, if we don't know a budget that a buyer is looking at do we take them to a $300k house or a million dollar one.
Let me elaborate. I'm talking about situations where the Agent is talking to the buyer about a specific house. They are probably at the actual house doing an inspection and the Agent is trying the old "how much can you afford" trick. I've never seen an Agent who doesn't ask this question. If a house is listed at $300K and the buyer admits to the Agent they are pre-approved by a bank to $300K but they only offer $280K, then the buyer is on the back-foot from the start as the Agent knows its safe to try to push them higher.
The Agent doesn't need to know how much the buyer can afford, just that the buyer is acting within their means.
Two, it always always good to know that a buyer has their finance approved other wise there is nothing worse for a seller going to contract and the buyer has no chance of getting finance and the property falls over.
I appreciate your frustration as an Agent trying to sell houses that fall over on finance. And its fair enough to ask if they have finance in order, but its the Agents who enquire specifically about the level of finance & borrowing capacity of the buyer so that they can push the buyer higher in negotiations. City agent ask kind of stuff this straight up and think nothing of it.
Its no doubt different in the country where you often have multiple Agent selling the same house, more emphasis on reputation, etc etc.
Three, a seller never really knows what they will take when selling a home neither does an agent. A seller has expectations and puts a price on a property hoping to achieve close to that as is there right. A buyer will put in an offer and negotiations start from there.
I think most people who decide to sell have a very specific figure in mind for much they want. And the Agent knows its listed at $A but i'll take anything over $B. Its got a lot to do with how much they owe the bank, what they paid originally, their selling costs and so on. So you need to find out from the Agent what the $B figure is.
But regardless, I'm talking about Agents who commonly "feign" not knowing price the seller wants as a way to make initial negotiations more awkward. Its a simple question, it should have an answer. My feeling is that if the Agent can't be upfront about what price the seller wants, then the buyer is probably going to to hustled.
Four, avoid house that have just come on the market ??
Yep. Big problem in Sydney and it's a problem that the OP is most likely having in high turn-over area like Quakers Hill. Imagine a buyer is looking for a house for ages, sees one they like that is 'just listed'. They inspect it straight away and make an offer. The Vendors/Agent then sit on that offer whilst they cultivate other better offers. This is a very common practice now in the cities. My point to the OP is not to waste your time/emotions/effort on those newly listed properties. Wait till there is an open house and its been on the market for a week or two. If you buy it in the first week you will most likely be paying full price.
Selling your property for $20,000 more than you wanted was good work by the agent. That's our job. Did your agent tell the buyer sorry but the seller only wants $420,000 don't worry about the extra $20,000.
I was thrilled... but the point is to warn others of this happening. We didn't ask the Agent to do it this either. We finishing signing up on a Thursday. They had buyers around on Friday and a signed contract on Friday afternoon at $20K over. They never even photographed the house or put up a for-sale sign. If the guy who paid $440K knew we only wanted $420K he probably would have offered something below $410K.
Unfortunately this is becoming common now for good houses to be marketed in this "market preview" state before a price is published. Buyers are invited in an shown the house without being given a specific price, rather they are asked to make an offer. Desperate buyers get carried away and if there are multiple buys on-site it can turn into a mini informal auction. Its great for the vendor but its terrible for the buyer as they can end up valuing the house themselves and paying too much.